Intrafamilial Child Torture (ICT) is a particularly severe form of child maltreatment with unique family dynamics and devastating outcomes for child victims. The dynamics and outcomes of torture for children in their families are comparable to other forms of child torture in non-familial contexts.
No separate diagnostic category exists for ICT. It is not widely recognized or understood by child maltreatment professionals, and there is little research data to help professionals fully understand it or know how to respond. We expect that ICT cases are often misdiagnosed or remain unidentified. We also contend that professional responses to other forms of child maltreatment may not be effective for ICT and may leave tortured children at extreme risk of serious harm.
In our work, we propose a working definition of ICT to raise professional awareness of the condition and to promote adoption of ICT as a category of child maltreatment. We also describe the most effective and specialized treatment interventions for children who have experienced extreme early trauma, including child victims of ICT.
Resources include case studies of child survivors to illustrate family dynamics, severity, outcomes for child victims, and legal issues.
Issues in Brief
Historically, intrafamilial child torture (ICT – the torture of children in their own families) has been a seriously understudied area of child maltreatment practice, even though ICT has very high rates of both very serious injuries and child deaths.
In 2021, CMPRC began its work to identify and compile the best available data on ICT, including: how it has typically been defined; what it looks like in families; the most common outcomes for children; how to differentiate ICT from other forms of serious child maltreatment; and how to best protect and treat child victims.
We initially did research to assess professional consensus for a broad definition of ICT to promote more consistent recognition and identification. In a second study, we reviewed media reports on 104 families identified as having tortured their children to better understand the types of parental acts and child outcomes most frequently seen in ICT cases. We then compared our findings with results from five other ICT case review studies to determine whether findings were consistent across study populations, time periods, and locations. We ultimately found very consistent results across all the case review studies, particularly with regard to common parental acts in ICT and outcomes for child victims.
These two Issues in Brief documents summarize our work and our conclusions, ultimately providing child maltreatment professionals with tools to consistently recognize ICT when they see it, to accurately distinguish ICT from other forms of severe maltreatment, and to enable them to respond quickly and effectively to protect these most vulnerable child victims.
New Policy Resource
In 2025, the Child Maltreatment Policy Resource Center conducted a research study to identify the parental behaviors and child outcomes that are typical in situations of ICT. We reviewed over 300 articles published in the mainstream news media about 104 families with severely maltreated children who were identified as having been tortured by their parents or adults acting in the primary parental role.
This document provides a verbatim description from the source articles of the types and scope of abuse and neglect inflicted on child victims of ICT. We have also noted the child outcomes, and in some cases the parents’ stated motivations for their treatment of their child.
We hope that by reading these descriptions, child maltreatment professionals will acquire a deeper understanding of what torture actually looks like, which will increase their ability to recognize the indicators of ICT and be prompted to do a deeper assessment to confirm or rule out ICT.
Policy Reports
Amicus Briefs
TAMMY SMATHERS, individually and on behalf of the ESTATE OF HARMONY BROOKLYN RAYNE CARSEY,
Plaintiffs-Appellant
vs.
RICK GLASS, Executive Director of Perry County Children's Services, et al.
Defendants-Appellees
AMANDA BRANDT, Plaintiff-Appellant
vs.
ROY POMPA, Defendant-Appellee
TAMMY SMATHERS, individually and on behalf of the ESTATE OF HARMONY BROOKLYN RAYNE CARSEY,
Plaintiffs-Appellants
vs.
RICK GLASS, Executive Director of Perry County Children's Services, et al.
Defendants-Appellees
Resources
Publications
Webinars
Our Blog
Contributors
Authors
Pamela Miller, JD, MSW, LISW-S
Senior Policy and Law Analyst,
Child Maltreatment Policy Resource Center
Ronald C. Hughes, PhD, MSSA
Executive Director, Senior Policy Analyst
Child Maltreatment Policy Resource Center
Institute for Human Services
Judith S. Rycus, PhD, MSW
Program Director, Senior Policy Analyst,
Child Maltreatment Policy Resource Center
Institute for Human Services
Victor Vieth, JD, JA
Senior Policy Analyst
Child Maltreatment Policy Resource Center
Janet Rosenzweig, PhD, MS, MPA
Senior Policy Analyst
Child Maltreatment Policy Resource Center
Amy J.L. Baker, PhD
Senior Policy Analyst
Child Maltreatment Policy Resource Center
Nan Beeler, MSW
Senior Policy Analyst
Child Maltreatment Policy Resource Center
Institute for Human Services
Daria Palatna, PhD, MSW
Senior Policy Analyst
Child Maltreatment Policy Resource Center
Institute for Human Services